Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)

CSCO 75.38

+0.2%

2:04 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: puborectalis who wrote (58038)	2/27/2002 9:38:13 AM
From: Dennis Doubleday	Read Replies (1) of 77400

Chambers is so well-compensated by Cisco that he shouldn't be bothering with small investments in technology companies where there could be any possibility of a conflict. That said, I don't think there's much substance to this story. Even if he hadn't given away the shares he got from the acquisitions, would it make any sense for him to make a bad deal for Cisco shareholders in any of these cases. A bad deal would drive down the value of his Cisco shares and options (estimated at 1 BILLION in value at one time), and he would do that just so he could make $5 million in an acquisition?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next