SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Money Managers after the Perfect Storm

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: RetiredNow who wrote (27)2/27/2002 6:18:05 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (1) of 46
 
mind, i asked a question in 1997/ 1998 as the bubble insanity heated up.

"where is all the rational analysis?" the answer i received was that rational analysis and a bubble could not co-exist.

well, the bubble was truth, so rational analysis must have been in a neighboring count!

i can't speak to your skills. i didn't intend to call them in question at all. we've reached different conclusions for this point in time and i've already admitted that i may be on the *wrong* side.

however, i do want to address the *credentials* issue. credentials don't mean crap to me b/c i've seen very smart folks pawn off pure bs as *analysis* and they had better *credentials* than you (and yours are good! ;-)! no, i'm not easily impress as nearly all the *credentialed experts* supported the bubble valuations and found ways to justify them! a ditch digger didn't come up with page views as a metric - an mba or accounting person did. a dishwasher didn't develop pro form (hypothetical) earnings to tout to the masses while submitting entirely different numbers to the sec.

now, don't take offense, i'm speaking generally. i will value your input based on the power of your ideas. i'm not like those clowns on the fedex commercial who ignore the idea of a worker and love the same idea from the boss and then haggle over the hand motion (very funny commercial b/c it carries a lot of ugly truth).

i think your approach is very reasonable given you aren't as cautious as myself *right now*.

my view is rather simple. in all of human history, i am not aware of any bubble that ended without some serious tough love. not one. of course, they never went from peak to trough instantaneously - it took time. from peak to trough, all sorts of arguments were made to justify the then current situation. will it happen again? maybe, maybe not. jusr b/c it has happened every time in human history doesn't mean it will happen here. right now, it is a risk i'm not willing to take in a big way. i'm about 20% invested in 5 smaller caps. that's all the exposure i want right now. IF this time is similar to 100% of all historical bubble situations then i *know* i'll have the cash to weather the bad times. this is a very comforting feeling.

when i'm more comfortable with valuations relative to future prospects, i may re-enter the market in force using professional help.

if i had a few mil sitting in an account somewhere, i'd be more aggressive in the market now! :-)

>>So hopefully, this provides some insight into why I chose to go with one. Best of luck to you Skeeter!<<

i have a pretty good feel for what you are doing and it seems very reasonable and rational to me. i also have some manager ideas to research. ;-) just b/c it isn't what i'm doing *now* doesn't mean it is wrong in my book, just different. heck, i already admitted there is a great chance your approach outperforms mine. heck, if i had your finances i might be doing something very similar to what you are doing - there are so many variables to consider.

i'd like to get in a situation where my employer provides mucho options so i get all the market upside w/o risking any downside. that is a win/win, imho. we'll see what happens... i have a decent options package now, but i'm not sure they will be worth much in the future.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext