SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)
AMZN 233.22+1.8%Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (139992)2/28/2002 7:03:25 AM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (4) of 164684
 
proof of greenspan's complicity in creating the biggest bubble in history... also proof that alan is intellectually dishonest and will change his view when convenient.

Proof? Of that? No. What I see looks more like intellectual dishonesty on the part of the writer - that good ol' oxymoron "journalistic integrity."

The quotes he pulls from the Sept '96 FOMC transcript are taken way out of context. AG's quote, as used, seems to imply that he agreed there was actually a financial bubble in the US markets in Sept '96. Well, that's not what he said. If you read the actual transcript, you will find that he was commenting on potential danger and potential actions in dealing with a bubble, should there be a bubble. His comment was in reference to Lindsey's expressed concerns that conditions were developing that could lead to a financial bubble, particularly excessive optimism about corporate profits. Lindsey also commented on the psychology of it, likening it to a "gambler's curse" where a string of good luck makes the gambler even more optimistic about his luck continuing (see page 24, last paragraph), and worried that "our luck may be about to run out."

What Roach conveniently leaves out of his "proof" is that, besides the dull reporting of economic statistics from the various FR banks and governors, the meeting is full of hypothetical discussions of scenarios that might develop from the trends that certain pieces of data might imply and the various possible ways that the Fed might best deal with those situations should they come to fruition.

BTW, in the Spring of '96, there was a mini-bubble of sorts in the early internet stocks, but by the time of that meeting, it was pretty much deflated and it wasn't until late the following Summer, or perhaps the Fall, that a few inets were let out of the dog house. It wasn't until late '98 that it became clear to many people there really was a bubble, but they were few and were shouted down by the addicted gamblers who were insisting that it's better to let your money ride. "Look at the streak I'm on - why would I want to stop now? In fact, you should put some money down, too, 'cause those wining hands just keep on coming." I seem to recall arguing with them right here. Weren't you one of 'em?

Bob

PS: AG's a funny guy. Hell, he even opened the meeting with a setup for a punch line from the SF Fed Gov. You could almost hear the "ba-da-boom" when he landed it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext