Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Grandk who wrote (11368)	2/28/2002 8:34:45 PM
From: Mitch Blevins	Read Replies (1) of 28931

>>Furthermore, it explains how a large generation of Jewish people (remember, most of the early Christians were Jewish) would have been willing to risk the damnation of their own souls to hell and reject what had been sociologically embedded in their community for centuries; namely, the Law must be kept for salvation, the Sabbath must be kept, nontrinitarian monotheism...<< Actually the early Jewish Christians in Jerusalem (led by James, brother of Jesus) were not trinitarians. They kept the Sabbath and the Law. It was Paul out among the pagans/gentiles where all the Christian growth came from. It was also Paul and the pagan/christians who dropped circumcision, dropped sabbath worship, and asserted Jesus/God equality. James and the Jewish Christians were not the big of a leap from the more traditional Jews. (read Galations lately?) So we have the people close to Jesus saying one thing and Saul/Paul (who had never met Jesus in life) saying another. The most reasonable explanation for this is that Paul's version (and the modern version) of Christianity is not really what the historical Jesus taught.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next