Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (20374)	3/1/2002 9:39:23 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (3) of 281500

Hi Maurice Winn; Re: "There are 5 billion of us who do not aspire to Moslem madness, repression, cruelty and archaic chimpoid male dominance hierarchies who hack off Jewish heads [or Kiwi heads]. Half the Moslems don't go along with it either [maybe more]. We are not going to live under the threat of mayhem at some random time of terrorist choosing. We will come for them first. So, all you Iraqi soldiers, get ready to surrender and immediately switch sides to a new, improved, Iraqi army with a well-off country based on civilisation instead of the barrel of Saddam's pistol [or Uday's]." The juxtaposition of these two paragraphs illustrates perfectly what is wrong with the idea of attacking Iraq. Iraq has nothing whatsoever to do with the Islamic fundamentalists or Moslem madness, except that they are also enemies of the United States. Iraq appears to have had little to do with the WTC attack. *Iraq is one of the most secular regimes in the Middle East.* If we knock it over, maybe then we'll eventually be left with a replacement that will be fundamentalist. At least with Afghanistan we were sure that the successor regime couldn't possibly be as much against us as the Taliban. -- Carl

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next