SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (232961)3/2/2002 6:51:55 PM
From: rich4eagle  Read Replies (2) of 769667
 
Here is where we totally differ, and your assumptions are wrong. You said I criticized the administrations actions against terrorism. I said that the current philiosophy (ie using exterminating terrorism as justification for an outlandish military buildup and sabre rattling against other nations) will lead to spending us broke and being hated. This is not mention using it as an excuse to enact George Orwells 1984. You assume that terrorism is the only this Admin is fighting. Additionally, your nasty remarks about democrats are way out of line. If the democrats were in power Bin Laden and Omar would already be dead. So far the closest leader to killing Bin Laden was Clinton and he missed by minutes without expending all of our resourses and destroying a country in the process. Additionally, what gives you the right to think that Democrats are incapable of waging war. Of the last three major wars this country embarked, a Democrat won one tied one and a Republican lost one. In a psuedo war against Iraq a Republican didn't finish the job. So if history is example we ought to have a Democrat in power if we want to win conflicts.

The worst part of your post is the notion that Americans ought not to express their opinion and just blindly follow your leader. The basis of this country and the total principle for which it stands is freedom and the PILLAR OF FREEDOM IS FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Versus censorship and police states. The Democrats have every right to ask what the end game and objectives are especially when the one asking is fourth in power in the US.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News