SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 95.11+4.0%10:12 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bilow who wrote (81322)3/2/2002 8:24:07 PM
From: cordob  Read Replies (2) of 93625
 
Thanks for the reply Bilow. But aren't they comparing PC800 with PC2400 or even PC2700 prices to get to this parity statement?

I am still a bit confused about this.

I have read in the hammer specs that it is unregistered DDR they are going to use; whether they would also use registered, I cannot really see why, maybe only if you wanted a lot of modules for a server. However if they can handle up to 4 GByte this way I doubt very much they will go higher on one hammer.The multi-hammers will take care of that with 4 GByte hanging off each of 4 hammers, accessible to each of them in "glueless" connection (whatever that is exactly).

I see the hammer as a screaming fast chip and hope AMD makes the schedule or improves on it.

Cheers
Cor
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext