Investment Chat Board Lawsuits Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mighty_Mezz who wrote (2527)	3/2/2002 10:19:33 PM
From: EL KABONG!!!	Read Replies (2) of 12465

Mezz, Interesting conflict in the Whatley case... Either he was or he wasn't properly notified... If he was notified, and he did accept receipt of the legal notification, and he freely opted to ignore it, then he (Whatley) screwed up big time. On the other hand, if he wasn't notified, and the plaintiff and/or the plaintiff's attorney(s) weren't entirely truthful with the court regarding notification, then they (the plaintiffs) have screwed up even worse than in the first possibility. A third possibility is that the defendant wasn't notified (someone else got the paperwork by mistake), and the plaintiffs proceeded under good faith and belief that the defendant was properly notified, in which case the default judgement would likely be set aside and the case tried (or settled). Any which way you slice the pie though, it's an interesting case... KJC

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next