Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 40.78

+0.7%

Dec 10 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (160948)	3/2/2002 10:47:28 PM
From: dale_laroy	Read Replies (1) of 186894

>We'll have to see what happens. Truthfully, I would have thought Barton to be crucial for AMD's very low power applications, including mobile and dense servers. On the other hand, maybe the cost involved with SOI really is larger than AMD anticipated, and perhaps combined with the desire to move resources to Hammer, Barton simply got cancelled.< It is possible that Hammer can be made lower power than Barton. With an integrated memory controller the processor itself would almost have to run hotter, but the extra power consumed by Hammer might not be as great as the power saved in the support chipset. If the above is not true, the decision to cancel all Barton processors would be a major mistake, although I think a bulk silicon Clawhammer for desktop would make more sense than Barton for desktop.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next