SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 210.78-4.8%Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: wanna_bmw who wrote (73117)3/4/2002 3:07:04 PM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
wbmw,

Model numbers only makes the Athlon XP look better with respect to the Pentium 4 from a marketing perspective. It has no relevance to performance, and in fact, it's even less accurate.

Now how is MHz accurate, if every processor has different performance at given MHz?

I agree about marketing angle. Here, AXP model numbers reflect their performance vs. P4 more accurately than MHz.


SpecInt Base Peak
P4 1.7 573 587
P4 2.0 640 656
AXP 2000+ 697 724
P4 2.0A 722 735


Joe
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext