THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (1122)	3/4/2002 3:55:25 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) of 21057

"Are those items supposed to further elaborate of the three sources?" Yes. "If so, are you saying that the combination of the three form a rational basis for faith in a Creator?" I am saying that the three are present for persons who are analysing their faith and making sense of it. The three do not necessarily cause one to believe. It is a way for rational people to continue to examine their lives and to avoid extremism. As I pointed out in an earlier post, you can understand the rationality of a religious basis and how it would make sense to believe it without believing it. I understand the basis for the trinity of Catholicism. I don't believe that Jesus is God. I believe nearly everything else said about him. Since I believe he recieved power from God that makes the point mute for me. I don't believe that the Holy Ghost is a being at all. I believe that the spirit of righteousness can pass through us, is apparent in the universe, can be strongly felt, and is from or attributed to God. If some people want to say that is God in ghost form I see the rationality, and it is a distinction I am not concerned enough about to debate as a belief issue.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next