Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)

AMD 214.11

+3.9%

Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Joe NYC who wrote (73587)	3/5/2002 9:18:36 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (2) of 275872

Joe, Re: "Are you saying that the project Yamhill does not exist, accounts of it are not believable, and you don't know anything about it? It is a little surprising, because on other subjects, you are like an encyclopedia of Intel related facts (once they have an official seal of approval)." I open up my encyclopedia, and find a blank page under Yamhill. Either it doesn't exist, or it's far out in the future, because something will have certainly leaked about it more than there is now if it were a 2003 "Plan B" technology. Like others have asked, where is the cry to developers? If Intel wanted to compete with x86-64 now before it launches, then they would have had to make a call to action, and start the FUD early. They would have also had to justify the move in the face of IA-64. Have they done anything like that? No. And by the way, I don't appreciate your continued insinuations about the source of my knowledge. Everything I post here is off the top of my head, unless I state otherwise. I'd thank you to remember that in the future. wbmw

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next