SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 209.43+0.9%3:45 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill Jackson who wrote (73457)3/6/2002 1:39:30 AM
From: Ali ChenRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
Bill, "..but can you quantify that?" [9 layers of Hammer]

According to classics, "Computer Architecture, a
Quantative Approach" by J.Hennessy and D.Patterson,
page 12-13,

Die yield = Wafer yield x (1 + Defect per area x Die area /N)^-N ,

where N is "roughly the number of masking levels".
In 1995, the good N was 3.

Substituting "Defect per area" = 0.5 /cm2, Die = 1 cm2,
and N=6, the yield in this model is 61.86%, while
for N=9 it gives 61.47%. So, draw your own conclusion
regarding impact of extra metal layers on Hammer yields.

I wonder what is the function of BS vs. FUD amongst
our friends, paid stooges?

- Ali
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext