Thread, why endorse posts like this by this guy Pravin? Not a single person responded to contradict the notion that I might be supplying a different viewpoint. I really don't think my posts amount to FUD, since I give plenty of credibility to both sides. Am I more pro-Intel? Yes. But do I only bash AMD? Certainly not.
Pravin just doesn't like to be told different opinions, and that's too bad. Especially since there are 10x more AMD positive posts than there are Intel positive posts, as well as 10x more Intel negative posts, than AMD negative posts here. That's why it's funny that the posts that I make threaten him enough to have put me on ignore. Sorry for disturbing the pretty glass house that some people like to live in, but if other people feel the same way, then that's kind of sad.
If this thread really liked to believe it was objective, then I wouldn't get all the garbage dumped on me that I do every day without a single person stepping up to defend me. I'll accept the fact that I may be wrong about some of my beliefs, but I also want to keep an open mind. I just need a little more convincing, but apparently people get angry at the fact that I am not immediately swayed to AMD - like I'm either stupid, or I'm an Intel employee hired to spread FUD on an Internet forum. LOL. Already, I look at AMD in a lot different way than I did a year ago. I'll probably change a lot of my opinions, but no one wants to even bother. If all I am is a FUDster to everyone, then it really isn't worth my time to be here. I like having a two way conversation, not a one-way bashing. So people here have to choose whether they want that kind of discussion, or if discussions that deviate from the popular norm really are taboo. Your choice.
wbmw |
