SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 252.25+0.9%Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sam Citron who wrote (61581)3/6/2002 5:25:19 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
Thanks. I was afraid of that. The answer to any tax question seems to be: Yes and no; it depends on _______ (fill in the blank with enough IRS gibberish to give me a headache.)

I stopped using a CPA, when I found I paid better attention to details, than an expensive and highly recommended tax preparer.

As always, my motto is, "Assume nothing, trust no one, check everything. Then, tommorrow, check it again, as it may have changed." Today, I checked to see if the rules on estimated payments had changed. They had. For some inscrutable, bizarre, absurd reason, the IRS changed the % of last year's taxes that I have to pay this year, to ensure no penalty, from 108.6% to 112%. Where the hell did they come up with 108.6%? It's probably the sum of the ages of the grandchildren of the Treasury Secretary, or some other equally valid reason. And why change it to 112%? Maybe because the grandkids got older? Arrrggghhhhh.

Rest assured, when I get audited, I won't tell them you were my tax advisor. I can imagine the response, if I tell the IRS auditor, "Well, I was talking to this guy on the internet, on a stock board, no I don't know if his name really is Sam, and he told me......."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext