SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi-Equips - Buy when BLOOD is running in the streets!
LRCX 148.32-3.3%Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: willcousa who wrote (10282)3/6/2002 7:12:15 PM
From: Katherine Derbyshire  Read Replies (1) of 10921
 
>>Those SPC's had to have lost a lot more money than the investors in them took out. I wonder who made the bulk of the money. Congress should look at who took the other side of the hedging transactions. <<

As I understand it, the whole problem is that the "hedges" didn't actually hedge anything. Enron essentially took both sides of the transaction because it agreed to make good on any partnership losses with Enron stock. So all the risk stayed with Enron, while the investors in the partnerships (including Enron executives) got rich. *That's* why people are throwing words like "fraud" around.

Disclaimer: I'm not an accountant. My information comes from the Enron board's internal investigation, the report of which is posted on the New York Times site and probably elsewhere as well.

Katherine
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext