Joe, "At this point, it looks like AMD has an advantage in the fact that they will be the first ones to deliver 64bit computing to the desktop level prices."
I do not see much of advantage here. The 64-bit platform is useful only to big enterprise servers and few computational scientists. While the latter could immediately benefit from 64-bit platform, they are very few in numbers.
The enterprise machines are a different story. The main cost goes to redundant storage and hot-swappable power supplies, to high-bandwidth memory with high level of data correction, to bridges that incorporate error-correction monitoring and statistics gathering, to chipsets with wide fast busses and performance monitoring means built in hardware, to rack-mounts and stable thermal management and power conditioning. You cannot bring these guys to desktop-level prices by making a cheap CPU alone.
To convince a server-maker to build around a non-Intel CPU, you need to convince them about unconditional support and intercompatibility with many components, including seamless software support, and promise a solid technological roadmap where you are in control - new interconnect busses, optical interconnects, etc. Guess who looks more convincing when talking to server's OEM?
The only open area could be the high-end CAD-CAM workstations, to work on ever-growing design databases, but I am afraid that big server pricing considerations are equally valid here as well, so I remain skeptical.
Regards,
- Ali |