THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dayuhan who wrote (1793)	3/8/2002 10:21:16 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) of 21057

I have no objection to considering alternative explanations. I do not think you make a very strong case for supposing that the explanations are ultimately materialistic, but that cannot be ruled out. I do not find anything remarkable in supposing that God has plans that He we do not completely understand, and therefore that we are not privy to His motives. That would be the nature of the case, if He existed. There is no reason to point out the obvious. We were discussing the satisfactoriness of traditional explanations. Your objection was not strictly logical, but, in part, a matter of sensibility. I merely commented on that.......

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next