SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 34.50+2.6%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Engel who wrote (161719)3/10/2002 12:55:51 PM
From: Dan3  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
Re: All the EVENTS, BENCHMARKING, etc. are 95% MAD dominated

Which correlates with the performance of the two processors. On almost any code that hasn't been carefully hand tweaked to work around P4's fussy architecture, Athlon's robust architecture provides better performance.

Intel's design teams always start from "if the compiler will produce perfect code, how do we design the chip."

While AMD's design teams start from "what's the best design to run the code produced by real world compilers."

The result: AMD's chip is better on 95% of software, while Intel's chip is better on the 5% (or less) of the code out there that has been tweaked to be "perfect" for that particular chip.

By the time more than 5% of the code base is suitable for a given Intel architecture, Intel is shipping a new design, with new weaknesses, that needs different optimizations to perform well.

And that's why AMD's chips are now, and will continue to be, better for 95% of the software out there, while Intel's chips are great for a handful of specially optimized programs and mediocre on everything else.

watch.impress.co.jp
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext