I'm sure Laz has said nasty things about you on RWET, and probably about me as well. I hate that thread and the fact that they trash people, including me, who can't post. I myself have never knowingly posted negative remarks about people on forums from which they are excluded. I don't know if this is true of you or not. Is it?
You appeared, perhaps I am wrong, to be implying that the reason Laz proposed that he'd answer you about his thread's header (should you be posting about someone with whom you have a toorabout in place?) was perhaps because it was essential to his happiness. It is you who inserted that notion into the discussion. He merely offered to explain things to you, with your permission. So that was a gratuitous crack. Possibly deserved iyo because of past cracks of his? -- but surely since he isn't posting to or about you at your request, it would behoove a person interested in good behavior not to toss cracks in his direction at this time?
But I wouldn't "impose" it on him if he hadn't offered. I wouldn't beg for it, I wouldn't ask anyone else to get it for me, I wouldn't look for people to "mediate" and this is NOT about Poet.
I have no clue who the hell it's about or why you've raised the matter, actually.
Yes, I think it was nasty of you to say I had "tried to manufacture facts," because trying to manufacture facts is trying to lie. I think you like to be nasty but also to be sanctimonious, and the second requires you to deny the first. That's just my opinion, of course. |
