I understand that. You asked Laz not to post to or about you, and when he complied, didn't notice, so of course you didn't have any hesitation to post about him. Understandable.
I think maybe when your "calling bad behaviors as [you] see them" involves, for example, your asserting that a 'behavior' I have engaged in is "trying to manufacture facts," for some agenda of mine, then the difference between you and a name-caller is quite blurred. It is my impression that I was called a liar with an agenda by you today!
Now, if you can make a good case that I'm a liar with an agenda, it isn't name-calling, it's a description.
You can't, though. You said it in a fit of pique. So it's name calling, imo. |
