NextWave Reaches Its Crest Court Decision Leaves Unhappiness In Its Wake BY MARK ROCKWELL MARCH 11, 2002 WIRELESS WEEK wirelessweek.com
WASHINGTON The U.S. Supreme Court's decision last week to hear the FCC's appeal in the NextWave Telecom Inc. case brought gasps of surprise and dismay from all corners of the wireless industry, which was hoping the five-year battle over the company's disputed spectrum would at last be resolved.
NextWave's plummeting stock price seemed to be the only immediate effect of the decision. Beneath the surface, however, the industry braced itself for at least another year, and possibly much longer, on the NextWave roller coaster.
Companies embroiled in the dispute put on a brave face, saying they're in no immediate trouble because of the court's decision, but no one is happy about it either. Several major wireless players bid billions of dollars in a January 2001 re-auction of NextWave's licenses, which the FCC reclaimed after the company declared bankruptcy in 1999. The carriers were hoping to use the additional spectrum to expand their networks and upgrade to next-generation services. But a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., ruled the FCC had violated federal bankruptcy laws when it took back the licenses, a decision that lead the agency to appeal to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court's decision to hear the appeal will add at least another year before some kind of resolution is reached, observers say. Filing legal briefs, hearing oral arguments and reaching a decision likely will stretch into mid-2003, says Michael Gill Jr., director of research at Tejas Securities Group. If the FCC wins, the case will be remanded back to U.S. district court for action, which could take another nine months to a year, Gill says. "That's the worst-case scenario," he says.
"In the short term, this is going to have little impact" on NextWave, says the company's spokesman, Michael Wack. The company said in mid-February that it began phase one of its network rollout in 60 markets across the country. Those markets now have data service capabilities and another two markets will be up and running by April that will be voice and data capable, Wack says.
Still, NextWave is disappointed with the Supreme Court's decision. "We'd hoped to have [the appeal] denied and emerge from reorganization with funds to go ahead with phase two," Wack says. That phase, which would expand NextWave's network in more markets, probably will be put on hold, given the uncertainty of the company's spectrum, he says.
NextWave's stock, which trades over the counter, dropped like a stone last Monday after the Supreme Court announced it would hear the appeal, plummeting from $6.50 a share just before the announcement to about $2.75 a few minutes after. The company isn't the most attractive acquisition target at this point either, analysts say.
But the company can continue on for now in spite of its spectrum being in legal limbo. "They can afford to chase the rainbow" for a while, says Ric Prentiss, managing director for the telecommunications services research group at Telecommunications Equity Research. "NextWave can build out 'boom box' high-powered transmission boxes serving only a few customers networks in its markets" with little effort, Prentiss says. The company is bound by FCC rules to build out serviceable networks in the markets where it has licenses or risk losing them.
Verizon Wireless, one of the major bidders in the re-auction, is in an unenviable position as well. "Verizon is in a tough spot," Prentiss says. "It's got about $1.7 billion tied up in deposits at the FCC." A U.S. court of appeals recently denied the company's petition to get its deposits refunded, so the company probably will have to turn to heavy lobbying at the White House and on Capitol Hill for any chance of getting its money back, Prentiss says.
Verizon spokesmen say only that the company will continue to seek the return of its deposit. Sources within the company say it is in no immediate need of the additional licenses. "There aren't any near-term implications of not having the spectrum," says one Verizon executive, because the carrier has enough to support the rollout of new services until roughly 2004.
The company is looking at alternatives to regaining the NextWave spectrum but hasn't ruled out going back to the company itself, says the source. He declined to provide details on how the company would approach another deal, but says any settlement would require the FCC's cooperation.
Analysts agree that a settlement similar to the one reached by NextWave, the rebidders and the FCC toward the end of last year probably is a long shot now. That deal, which failed to win congressional approval by the deal's deadline, would have reimbursed NextWave for turning over its licenses to the rebidders and left the U.S. Treasury with several billions in additional dollars raised at the re-auction.
In a related development, the FCC denied a petition by TPS Utilicom Inc. that challenged the bid by Alaska Native Wireless in the NextWave re-auction. The petition said Alaska Native was basically acting as a front for AT&T Wireless. The re-auction was supposed to help small carriers win the licenses. The FCC said the matter was best left to the courts to decide, not regulators. |