Hmm, I have heard many finnish (and some Nokia) opinions that there are places and situations for copper calble, fiber, wireless this and that, all depending on an open, competitive, and well regulated market. (Adam Smith was too far north of Licensing London to figure out that last thing??)
It would, obviously, feel safe, if only one solution would solve everything, instant killer and profit,etc..
802.11b has some efficient areas of deployment, but obviously not in too crowded (disruptive) and mobile 2.4GHz areas.
Ilmarinen
Btw, one good result of living in a political system with old(er than) jeffersonial, agrarian, independent traditions, in the middle of the forest, is that everything is not urban nor rural.
WLAN has its place in both, although for different reasons and in different ways, but neither one will hopefully be a matter of a quick buck. |