SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : John, Mike & Tom's Wild World of Stocks

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John Pitera who wrote (2672)3/12/2002 1:17:33 AM
From: John Pitera  Read Replies (1) of 2850
 
Herb Greenberg thinks SONS is already overpriced, even if CSCO buys it.

-------------------

Is Sonus Worth the Price?
By Herb Greenberg
Senior Columnist

03/11/2002 07:10 AM EST
URL: thestreet.com

Sonus silliness: Careful about getting caught up in Friday's rumor that Cisco (CSCO:Nasdaq - news - commentary) may be interested in buying Sonus Networks (SONS:Nasdaq - news - commentary) .

The news caused Sonus' stock to leap nearly 16.8% Friday, closing at $3.83. But at that price, say some short-sellers, Sonus may be expensive. Sonus makes what is known as a "media gateway" -- a link that takes voice messages out of the circuit-switched world and drops them into the packet-switched universe of Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP. For better or worse, say the shorts, it's really nothing more than a commodity business with tumbling prices.

What's worse, points out one Sonus short, at least one-third of its customers, such as Global Crossing (GBLXQ:OTC BB - news - commentary) , Z-Tel (ZTEL:Nasdaq - news - commentary) and XO Communications (XOXO:OTC BB - news - commentary) , have all but died, while others -- Level 3 (LVLT:Nasdaq - news - commentary) and DataNet -- are on the ropes.

Where does that leave Sonus? Depends on how acquisitive Cisco or any other company in its space, such as Lucent (LU:NYSE - news - commentary) or Nortel (NT:NYSE - news - commentary) , really cares to be right now. None are under pressure to make acquisitions. "Or in the case of Lucent and Nortel," says the short, "no real currency to do it."

But wait, there's more: In all of 2001, according to Goldman Sachs, Cisco paid $330 million for two acquisitions. The last time Cisco paid $800 million was sometime around the height of the bubble. That's roughly what it would cost to buy Sonus at today's price plus the cash on its books. But at 4.7 times sales (subtracting cash), that's a sharp premium to the 3.5 times sales (using a fourth-quarter sales run rate) Ciena (CIEN:Nasdaq - news - commentary) recently said it would pay for ONI Systems (ONIS:Nasdaq - news - commentary) , which, while in a different business than Sonus, is considered a stronger company than Sonus.

At that same 3.5 times sales, Sonus would fetch $3 a share. And that's a best-case scenario.

Ciena paid a 12% premium to ONI's share price at the acquisition. Back that 12% out of Sonus and you get a stock that should be trading at $2.64 -- and stocks shouldn't be trading at their acquisition price.

That's assuming it gets acquired. A Sonus spokeswoman declined comment. And this note: If Cisco's really interested in buying a company like Sonus, there are a few private companies, if they were for sale, that could be bought for much less.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext