<font color=red>JLA: THE FACTS
In an email to me, JLA told me the following:
> >Jeff said I was suspended for a personal attack, vulgarity and threatening CH.
> >
> > Facts:
> >
> > I was personally attacked by CH called a liar and my professional competence was lampooned. I responded in
> > kind, an old SI tradition.
> >
> > I told CH his characterization of his stalking Poet as some sort of intellectual freedom issue was a
> crock of ****. I called him obsessed, a (very mild, non-vulgar insult deleted), a liar and a coward.
> I also called him a (very mild, non-vulgar insult deleted) and told him
> to (very mild, non-vulgar verb deleted) himself. Jeff called the nancyboy, whackjob
> and (very mild, non-vulgar insult deleted) you comments "obscene".
> >
> > Finally, I told CH I was done being nice to him and in
> > light of his personal comments that I was "taking off
> > the gloves". Jeff calls this a threat altough there
> > is no threat of any sort of physical violence in those
> > words and despite the fact I was physically threatned
> > by another poster and no action was taken.
> > My guess is that nancyboy Chris when whining and
> > threatening another lawsuit.
> >
If anyone is interested in what "(very mild, non-vulgar insult deleted)" and "(very mild, non-vulgar insult deleted)" were, PM me. I deleted them to (hopefully) prevent myself from being suspended.
I did see the post by Chris Hodgkins attacking JLA's professional competence. It was highly insulting and quite personal.
I have JLA's permission to post the above. |
