SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (2725)3/15/2002 9:20:03 AM
From: thames_sider  Read Replies (1) of 21057
 
Should, undoubtedly.

Could, I'm not so sure... the British army in 1936, even in 1938, was minuscule (compared with the German one) and woefully ill-equipped and underprepared...
Meanwhile, the French army was French-staffed and French-led <vbg> More seriously, the French were geared only for a defensive war, not an aggressive one; and were again very antiquated, expecting a re-run of WW1-style tactics and practice.

If we'd had better bluffers, stronger characters, in charge - Churchill and de Gaulle, for example - then Hitler would probably have backed down nonetheless if confronted over the Saar, or maybe the Rhineland - after that it was too late, IMO, he'd have known he could win comfortably if war had started in 1938 precisely because we were so unready.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext