Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 39.54

+7.5%

10:57 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (162299)	3/15/2002 6:09:42 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (2) of 186894

bmw ok one more thing or rather more on price-war, on a number of occasions I spoke against intel pricing strategy. I have not built a complete model (did not really have time) but it seemed that there was no real benefit from decreasing prices. AMD always lowered them after intel so the balance would not be upset. Now it would make sense to me if there would be extra no constraints on intel but the expected gm created a constraint. So intel was not really capable of going low enough to hurt amd. It seems like barrett was determined on hurting intel and amd shareholders without even remote possibility of success. If you were not sarcastic then comment Regards -Albert ps BTW few times barrett announced of share gains as a justification for his strategy and each time it proved to be either draw, share loss or very insignificant gain. Instead of treating his announcement with some skepticism they are assumed to be true without question by most here. I question Jerry's actions all the time so how come barrett is above that.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next