Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 40.56

+10.3%

12:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: AK2004 who wrote (162343)	3/16/2002 12:15:30 AM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (1) of 186894

albert, Re: "does it make any difference that it was "Posted: 20/06/2001 at 15:51 GMT"? Not exactly the 4q, is it?" The effect of lowering prices is never immediate. It takes at least a quarter for the effects to be absorbed by the market. Your link was from the tail end of Q2, and it said: "We have had 80 per cent plus marketshare," he said. "We intend to stay at that level or move upward." It is true that Intel has had 80% market share. It is also true that Intel intended to move upward, and in fact they did - eventually. Therefore, the quote, including a fact and a prediction, is absolutely correct. The prices that were cut on the Pentium 4 in Q2 allowed Intel to gain market share in Q3, even though AMD dropped prices to $65 ASP. Intel's further cuts in Q3 allowed them to gain much more market share in Q4, even though AMD launched the Palomino. And you are still trying to prove that Barrett made incorrect comments. You are also trying to prove that Intel shouldn't have lowered prices. You are wrong on both counts, so I am still waiting for your apology. wbmw

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next