albert, Re: "if you did not then how would you explain this one"
In your last post, you said:
"or. yeh the one that shows amd never having 20% market share."
I still maintain that never said that.
In your link, I said the following:
"As for Craig Barrett, I never remember him making any kinds of claims regarding gains in market share, especially under the conditions that you explain."
This is true. I did not remember anything where Barrett made claims of market share. However, these are your conditions.
"few times barrett announced of share gains as a justification for his strategy and each time it proved to be either draw, share loss or very insignificant gain."
You found a link where Barrett mentions market share:
theregister.co.uk
But I proved to you that his link did not satisfy your conditions.
siliconinvestor.com
I have nothing to hide. I admit that I could not remember Craig Barrett making statements about market share, but you showed me a link where he did. However, you still have not proven your original point, and yet I have disproven it on multiple counts.
Therefore, you get confrontational and say the following:
"I am not willing to change the topic so when I prove you wrong again you would again change the topic without ever admitting that you were wrong
I am waiting for your apologies"
I am sorry for you, albert. You will not receive an apology from me for pointing out the facts. If you were at all decent, though, you'd apologize to me for your behavior, which has not been very constructive tonight. But like I said, I won't hold my breath.
wbmw |
