I apologize for posting to you today, since I know you and I have a toorabout, as do you have one with Poet.
Christopher, I shook my head at the fact that you couldn't resist the crack about her in this post of last week:
I didn't even turn him in when he posted highly offensive personal comments pretending to claim that my wife had left me, but revealing personal information is a clear no-no..
Although it was done by a Poet supporter as an aspect of her "defense,", I hope she had nothing to do with it personally.
(while laughing out loud at "but revealing personal information is a clear no-no," since that is precisely what you have threatened to do to Poet).
(The head-shake was at your trying to (once you had blackmailed her main defender into silence by threats to reveal personal information about her that will harm her), plant, in the minds of those not following closely, the gratuitous notion that perhaps Poet did do such an egregious thing.)
That was an indefensible violation of the toorabout on your part, and you got away with it.
But moving right along. Today you posted about Poet over on IHub.
So here's your-and-my new toorabout, Oh Incorrigible CH:
Next time you use IHub to indulge your fixation on Poet at her expense, I'm going over to IHub to explain fully, with links, what happened over here. If the toorabouts don't include IHub, IOW, that works both ways.
And if you insist on violating on SI the toorabout in place between you and me and you and Poet, I will violate it on SI, too, post for post, from now on.
I'm sorry to have violated our toorabout, Christopher, and as a defense, did it with a link to a post here in which you engaged in such a violation on purpose.
I really think you shouldn't start up again, Christopher, if you want what you said you want, for this animosity to end. If you can't even manage the 30 day "cooling off" that you yourself asked for, how do you expect this state of affairs to end permanently? |
