SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: The Philosopher who wrote (45667)3/17/2002 8:44:53 PM
From: E  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
Reality means nothing to you. You remind me (and others) of a sexually obsessed psychopathic stalker.

Whose eyes are you writing for, anyway?

Everyone here knows I made no toorabout with you separate from a deal that you'd leave poor Poet alone. Why would I? I have no objection whatever to you writing to me.

I'm merely trying to protect a friend of mine, a woman with whom you are sexually (is the scary impression you give) obsessed, and whom you have threatened, and who is too frightened of you to defend herself.

You know all this! Everyone knows all this! So you're writing either for someone else's eyes or as an excuse for the resumption of your cyberstalking of Poet.

And you posted to her again today on IHub. Amazing.

If you are so "honest and honorable" (hilarious), why have you broken your toorabout with Poet, who hasn't posted to or about you?

Just wondrin', Mr. Honest, Mr. Honorable, Mr. Lies-About-Being-a-Minister-and-Lets-His-Friends-Defend-Him.

You are an obfuscator, at best. (As you yourself admit):

Message 17089431

And not only are you a self-proclaimed obfuscator, you are dumb as a rock to think it isn't clear that it isn't about you and me, it's about your fixation with my creeped-out friend Poet.

How dysfunctional is it for you to write both:

It had nothing to do with anything or anybody else.

And

"If you continue this, I will have to reveal information which I have resisted for a long time revealing, in order to prove that you are lying. But that information will not help Poet, and in fact may well hurt her.

?

It's simple: Leave Poet alone, as you lyingly said you were doing in this post:

Message 17182238

After writing which, when neither she nor I had breathed a word to or about you, you've written about her twice and to her once.

Read my caps:

IF YOU CAN RESIST THE TEMPTATION TO POST TO OR ABOUT HER AS YOU HAVE SAID YOU WOULD DO BUT ARE NOT DOING, YOU WILL NOT HEAR FROM ME OR HER AGAIN.

WHY DID YOU POST ABOUT POET WHEN YOU SAID YOU WOULDN'T DO IT ANY MORE???

It's so simple. Or would be if when the urge to engage Poet seized you, you'd resist it.

So simple.

Resist the temptation. Resist it. All will be well, then.

Is this why you can't figure this out?

rense.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext