SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ManyMoose who wrote (239610)3/18/2002 10:54:03 PM
From: Kevin Rose  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
Sorry, I did not mean to set a trap. I looked it up after posting the original question, and was surprised at the answer. That means each state would need a separate law banning felons from owning and possessing firearms. I assume they all do now, but couldn't find it.

I think the paranoia about the ATF is way overdone. I say that the benefit, tracking criminals through illegal movement of guns, is more important than any harrassment possibilities. Are you saying that you won't put up with the possibility of harrassment in exchange for stopping criminals?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext