SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (3412)3/19/2002 8:32:21 AM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) of 21057
 
This particular example of "public castigation" started with you repeatedly asking what it was that warranted an apology.

Yep. If X was really interested in an apology, SHE would have answered. She'd rather be a victim. I got a PM from another member of the VRWC last night linking me to X's new and improved profile. You ought to check it out.

Once I figured out that X wasn't going to answer your question, I did, in an even and constructive tone.

Really? You speak for X? Are you on retainer?

I suggest it would be appropriate for X to answer the question herself since she made the request for an apology. That way there won't be any misunderstandings.
That's my point. No federal case involved.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News