Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 36.78

+2.7%

Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (162536)	3/19/2002 5:37:05 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Tench, Re: "when the jump from Winstone 97 to 98 was made, Intel processors benefitted more from the transition than AMD. Of course, to the AMDroids at the time, this was proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Intel was manipulating the benchmarks. Watch those accusations return as Intel continues to extend its lead in the 2002 benchmarks. Classic case of history repeating itself." I'm sure you're right. Take a look at AMD's overall performance measurement, and then subtract Winstone 2001, the only benchmark where AMD can claim a 24% performance gain (and a benchmark that will soon be obsoleted by Winstone 2002). athlonxp.amd.com For that matter, also remove the "patch" that Dan3 says may "harm" system stability, and you'll see the Athlon XP 2100+ all of a sudden look like a 2100-. If I remember correctly, you were the one here that questioned AMD's model numbering scheme from the beginning, were you not? I wonder for how long QuantiSpeed will still be valid, with results dwindling as fast as these.... wbmw

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next