SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 36.78+2.7%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Engel who wrote (162527)3/20/2002 1:32:00 AM
From: John F. Dowd  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
Paul et al: This is interesting:

Maximum PCs April issue reviews the latest HP Pavilion 950. The first OEM system they've reviewed with the GeForce4, it also came with a 2.2GHz P4, and 1GB of PC2100 DDR.

It got a record SYSmark2001 score for them, 202, faster than any other machine they've tested. However, when commenting on the configuration they say "For now anyway, the HP can't be beat -- except by other Pentium 4 machines using RDRAM."!!!

They continue "In our own tests, 2.2GHZ Northwood RDRAM configurations have turned in scores about 5 percent faster than similar configs using Intel's own DDR chipset. We believe the choice of DDR over RDRAM put a crimp on the Pavilion's scores, which, while great, could have been stellar. But that's a choice you'll have to make: a bit more performance or less-expensive memory." OK, so they're not quite up on the cost parity issue yet.

Their final comment "If we had a do-over, we'd probably spec the Pavilion with RDRAM instead of DDR." JFD
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext