SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (3600)3/20/2002 10:26:25 AM
From: E  Read Replies (1) of 21057
 
The fact that law enforcement officials often resist DNA tests should give us pause not only about their immediate motivations, to cover up a specific possible humiliating goof, but also about how sure we should be that considerations other than a pursuit of truth and justice always govern, in trials in general.

This isn't a complaint about our system, which I believe to be about the best human beings have devised. It's an observation about human nature. Motivation affects perception. There are strong motivations for those on the prosecution case to solve cases and convict somebody.

They aren't (usually) evil for, uncomfortably frequently, convicting the wrong person. They are human, and see it as they wish to. As they need to to win rewards, material rewards and ego rewards.

I think we have sufficient evidence that this is the case that we shouldn't be either refusing DNA tests or putting citizens to death.

After death, you remain convicted, innocent or guilty.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext