PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: DavesM who wrote (240126)	3/20/2002 11:04:20 AM
From: joseph krinsky	Read Replies (1) of 769670

I was exaggerating to make a point. (900 BC) They were they most powerful in their area. There was no one else. They were not the most powerful on Earth. They may have been when the Mongols etc were running around. Opium from what I have read about it, addicted several million Chinese, however I do not think that the addiction can be the blame of their downfall, even 20 million addicts on a % basis isn't that many for them. It's a nice argument, but the Chinese had more deeply seated problems, and opium wasn't the cause of their stagnation. No agricultural nation can ever be the most powerful nation on Earth for long, if they ever do achieve that status, because power isn't gotten from farming. It's gotten from industry. We're not in the middle or ancient ages where bows and arrows win wars, or masses of people. As the weapons of wars changed, the power base shifted from those things. If they were the most powerful nation on Earth at the time, they would not have lost to the British. They resisted progress, and that was their stumbling block.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next