Charles, your propensity to fabricate arguments out of thin air wastes all our time:
From today's morning transcript:
This is what the court said after the attorney for sun got through with his argument: (edited for format only added)
THE COURT: Context doesn't work. Let's discuss this as a real evidentiary issue. This is hearsay. And unless you can come up with some way of giving me some exception to consider it, then -- I mean, key to this, it seems to me, is the fact that Microsoft is supposedly doing something with the OEMs that are making them change their mind or renegotiate or do something else.
------------------------
The OEMs, you know, being difficult on their own, frankly, doesn't tell me anything or doesn't aid my analysis at all. So if it's going to be through hearsay, then I'm not going to allow it. All right. Now, as I said you may have other ways of getting this information in in a different way, but the fact that he happens to know this, you know, repeating back his experience, which is a repetition of strictly hearsay, doesn't help.
---------
(attorney for microsoft) It's classic hearsay within hearsay.
THE COURT: I've already ruled in your favor. You
don't need to argue the same thing. |
