Worst stocks for '96 Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Worst stocks for '96

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Michael Hillman who wrote (106)	1/24/1996 12:04:00 PM
From: olduser	of 312

Hi Michael Hillman. After receiving a message from you this morning regarding my negative opinion of NSCP, I started reading your state- ments over the last few weeks regarding this stock. I'd like to know your investment experience, because it seems to me, you're new at the game. You claimed you "could have made a wad of cash" on this one. Well, shoulda, coulda, woulda got you nowhere. The reason I feel you have little investment experience is your excitement over the stock's performance. If you bought at the historic low ($45.75) and sold at the all time high ($174), you would have gained 280%. Great return, but what's the excitement for? I watched my C-Cube options go from .75 last tuesday, to $5.50 when I sold on Friday. The point of telling you this is that there are alot more exciting returns and wild rides out there than Netscape. Netscape is fun for the little investor. That's where the buying is coming from. In fact, NSCP has less that 10% institutional ownership. I hope I'm not insulting you. I'm really just trying to debate the validity of Netscape's rise. Please respond to this and proven you know more about investing the Frankenstein sequels.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next