THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Solon who wrote (4018)	3/21/2002 1:56:11 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) of 21057

Yes. All of them. Actually all of them in the post I was replying to where from a long time before 20 years ago. I do think there was one about 1960 but most of them where decades before that. In the post I am replying to now you do provide examples from within the past 20 years (thanks, that is what I was asking for) but here again its not all of them. However, this is a minor complaint of relatively low importance because you have apparently provided what I asked for (I'll have to look more at the details to be sure). While technically it was not "all of them", it isn't really important for it to have been "all of them". Also the 20 year limit is admittedly arbitrary, I just put it in place so that we would be talking about the system as it currently works rather then some past defect that might have been corrected. I would have made it less then 20 years if it wasn't for the 10 year average time between conviction and execution. A more important distinction about all those post 1970 cases you post is that none of them deal with someone who was actually executed. However I do think you did a good job of bringing up some cases where our legal system did not work properly. Tim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next