SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill who wrote (4024)3/21/2002 2:51:21 PM
From: J. C. Dithers  Read Replies (1) of 21057
 
Some posters here use SI as a bulletin board, posting everything a Google search turns up on a subject like the death penalty. They don't care whether these cases of "innocent people executed" are true or not. They just want to bury the discussion under an avalanche of unsupported claims and bogus statistics. This carpet bombing tactic is the cyberspace equivalent of shouting people down in an intelligent discussion. If you respond to them, you only get more of the same junk in return. It's not worth it.

Sometimes you can spot a familiar case in the pile, such as the Roger Coleman one or the Tafero case. Then you can quickly expose how ridiculous these claims of "proven innocence" are. What you have really proved, though, is what a waste of time effort it would be to pick through the growing junk pile of false and misleading so-called examples.

You are totally correct that (1) there has not been a single credible, documented case of an innocent person being executed in the last half-century, and (2) the only valid examples are those where the system has worked as intended in squeezing out any mistakes in the lower courts.

JC

Edit: Before long, the tally of "innocent people executed" will be well in the thousands!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext