Jim,
I wish I had met REK, as you have. I've seen her once, on the recent ROB TV interview, but that experience lacks the information one gets from a personal encounter.
I don't know why you are saying this. I've never met
Rebecca Keeler.
For most of us, the question of her nature has to be resolved by other data, specifically, performance.
That's precisely what I said. She has what it takes
ie: to perform.
With no intent to detract from your personal observations (which have invariably been cautious and moderate) I would restate your words for those of us who must judge on other criteria:
This sentence clearly says that my observations are
personal and yours are not which is bogus.
The truth is that my many posts are littered with the
specifics of her accomplishments, a fact all who have read
them are very familiar with, and on this day I felt no
need to list them all again; but, summarized them with
the phrase 'she has what it takes'.
The majority of things you list I have posted in the past
as have many others here.
I fail to understand how you conclude that my observations
are 'personal' being different from 'those of us who must
judge on other criteria' and that (being clarified as
different from my criteria) is 'specifically performance'.
Your post not only misrepresents what I said; but, does
so from assumptions on your part that are untrue.
Wolf |
