Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: AK2004 who wrote (18245)	7/8/1997 8:12:00 PM
From: Jack L. Dlugach	of 1571826

Albert: Kealoha's name and attitude along with Anthony and PJackson and Yousef, et al, speak for their intellects one and all--remember the Borg 'cause that's what they are. Like I just told Creep-boy, this has nothing to do with AMD or Intel or any other stock--it has to do with their infantile ignorance and stupidity. That Timmy jerk posting that 28 cent stuff--he doesn't even get it that this is a stock thread and that is particularly the kind of thing that will get his funny butt kicked off the thread. Stupidity, that's all it is, and it reflects on them, not on AMD as an investment. BTW, DLJ is sure pro-AMD big time--if they've got it even 10% right, then AMD is worth holding and even adding to on pullbacks. I don't get why the big deal on the earnings--we all knew that the earnings were only first call estimates, the warnings of chip stock disappointments were all around us, and AMD has high expenses and had initial yield problems. Naturally I'd like to have seen that 22 cents come in on or over target but I was also ready for another quarter or two of losses before the changes took effect. All-in-all, the big increase in revenues is not disappointing.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next