SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: cosmicforce who wrote (4778)3/25/2002 6:10:49 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) of 21057
 
Laz said - "I am under no obligation to consider consider the sensibilities of someone else's religious prejudices. Period"

You replied - " So your stand on abortion (if you have one) is aligned with that of other conservatives? "

Religious opinions obviously impact on the abortion question but it is not itself a religious question. People with all sorts of religious faiths including atheism can be found on both sides. But even if you did consider being pro-life or pro-choice to be an example of religious prejudice (and I don't) Laz was not talking about abortion, and he was saying he was under no obligation to consider the sensibilities of someone else's religious prejudice, he didn't say that he either was under an obligation to consider the "religious prejudice" or that he was under any obligation not to consider it. For that matter he can consider something without agreeing with it.

Does it need explaining? Only if you want me to understand what you are talking about. :)

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News