SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 217.59+1.1%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Yousef who wrote (75566)3/25/2002 10:58:09 PM
From: pgerassiRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
Dear Yousef:

You forgot the most valuable point! The smaller die at the same defect density has a much higher yield. In other words, big is bad!

Defect density does not vary that much between cutting edge fabs at similar times as the wafers supplied to each fab come from the same sources (and any big differences would cause a shift in suppliers so they have great incentives to deliver product with not much larger defect densities than competitors). And most of those defects are caused by the underlying wafer are they not? Thus, the highest variable in these equations in typical use is the die size. And that does not favor Intel.

Pete
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext