SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neeka who wrote (242398)3/26/2002 5:44:00 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
There seems to only be two ways to keep the numbers of large SUVs down and that is to limit or ban their production or put a surtax on them. They are high profit items right now. It might even be possible for car companies to lower the prices a little to ease the effect of an excise tax.

People want these vehicles for various reasons, some practical, some not. If mpg were the factor in taxes would we tax based on the upper potential or the lower. IOW, would we consider the higher gross ability to carry passengers and cargo of an SUV or simply declare ownership defacto wasteful.

Gas taxes like tobacco taxes are "sin" taxes to many. Here in CA we have had to force the government through an amendment initiative to use gasoline taxes for their intended purpose, roads. Previously they were general funded and ended up who knows where for who knows what purpose. This showed up the fact that government and its constituents are not always on the same page. The only groups to oppose this were teacher's unions and health care advocates who were used to stealing from it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext