SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (22273)3/26/2002 6:04:47 PM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (3) of 281500
 
You haven't read about these movements because they aren't happening. When they do, they will be reported. We're talking about a force of at least 250,000, with a large armor component, the largest deployment since Desert Storm. Armored divisions don't move by air, and they don't sneak into town in the dead of night. When the move starts it will take weeks, and we will all know about it.

The deployment cannot begin until the basing issue is ironed out. You can't move an army if you have no place to move it to.

I would assume that the scenario will be similar to that of Desert Storm, with air forces initiating the attack and sustaining it during the time it takes to build up ground forces. Even that will be preceded by deployment of carriers and air units, which will be reported. The deployment will have to be very considerable. One of the larger problems confronting US planners will be the location and status of the remaining Taleban troops in Afghanistan. It is entirely possible that these units are lying low, many in neighboring countries, and biding their time until some US forces and their air cover are called off to Iraq. This would be their cue to re-infiltrate and step up the pressure, forcing a two-front war.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext