Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 40.36

-7.8%

3:35 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: AK2004 who wrote (163108)	3/29/2002 1:41:44 AM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (2) of 186894

albert, Re: "Amd model numbers is how they label their chips. Once the labeling is over it is only natural to compare your product with competition. Even if model numbers would be derived, and they are not, from p4 benchmarking p4 benchmarks are in public domain and as such can be used by amd." Explain to me why a 1.2GHz Athlon 4 is called 1.2GHz, but a 1.3GHz Athlon 4 is called 1500+. Then explain to me why a 1.33GHz Athlon XP with 266MHz front side bus can also be called 1500+, when the 1.3GHz Athlon 4 is 33MHz less, and uses only a 200MHz front side bus. If you don't want to discuss the desktop part, then the 1.33GHz Athlon MP will work just fine. The reason why ask is because I think that your argument about AMD basing QuantiSpeed on their older cores is bogus, and there is plenty of evidence to support this. AMD flat out lies when they say otherwise, and it strikes me as funny and ironic that you take their word for it, but if it were Intel saying something like that, you would be raising Holy Hell. wbmw

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next