SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Barrick Gold (ABX)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: nickel61 who wrote (2210)3/29/2002 4:13:13 PM
From: Enigma  Read Replies (2) of 3558
 
Let me try to make it simple enough for your bird brain to comprehend: Let's say the exercise price is $12 and the employee exercises options on 100,000 shares at $20. His 'gain' (unrealised) of $800,000 ($2,000,000 - $1,200,000) is taxed as income. If he exercises and sells immediately he has cash to pay the tax - in other words he has $800,000 in the bank to pay the tax of approximately $400,000. Let's suppose he exercises and holds the stock for a year and the stock drops in value to $12. Then he has no cash to pay the tax - The options have cost him $1,200,000 and he receives the same amount but still owes $400,000. He does I believe have a capital loss to offset against his other income - because his ACB is now $20 per share.

As a caveat I should add that there was a proposal to change the tax treatment of options - but I don't know if it was passed into law. But it seems that Canadians are still exercising and selling simultaneously, so the tax aspects must still be a hassle..

But you'll find that
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext