SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (45109)3/29/2002 8:23:51 PM
From: Math Junkie  Read Replies (1) of 99280
 
"You will have to provide me with dates. I see the bubble of 2000 that supports your notion."

I counted months when it first reached 160 from a lower
level, and looked at whether the COMP went higher in the
following two months:

$NAHL COMP Higher One to
to 160 Two Months Later?

Late June, 1999 No

Mid-Nov., 1999 Yes

Late Dec., 1999 Yes

Mid-May, 2001 No

Late June, 2001 No

I agree that the times when the COMP continued up after
$NAHL 160 were in the bubble period. Does that justify
disregarding the data? My point is that the correlation is
not good enough to draw conclusions one way or the other.
This becomes even more true when you consider Zeev's point
about the NASDAQ throwing out losers, which means that
today's 160 corresponds to a lower point on the $NAHL curve
when comparing to times before the losers got tossed.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News